Sedgwick, administering our warehouse foreman husband's California workers' comp file after a documented forklift crush injury in Fontana and an MRI showing an L4-L5 herniation contacting the S1 nerve root, denied surgical authorization at week 14 via Utilization Review by a physician reviewer in Ohio who never examined him, citing "insufficient conservative care documentation" against MTUS despite twelve weeks of prescribed physical therapy, three transforaminal epidural injections, and a treating orthopedist's PR-4 stating maximum medical improvement was unreachable without a decompression, and offered a modified-duty position at a distribution center 47 miles from home with an eight-pound lifting restriction his treating physician had already rejected in writing, then the URO denial letter recycled the exact same three MTUS citations his coworker got two weeks earlier on a completely unrelated injury. Forced surgical authorization plus a $184,000 medical set-aside and a $92,500 stipulated award using the California URO reversal framework: the IMR filing, the MPN dispute, the treating physician PR-4 correction, the QME panel request timed against the statutory window, the WCAB expedited hearing petition, and the Labor Code 5814 penalty invocation. the complete 22-week playbook from URO denial to signed C&R.
the injury was february, a warehouse aisle in Fontana, and my husband, a foreman with 17 years at the same third-party logistics operation, was pinned between an outbound pallet jack and a shelving...